<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>borealnemeton.org &#187; bar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://borealnemeton.org/tag/bar/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://borealnemeton.org</link>
	<description>Mostly Plants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 02:05:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>After the bar…</title>
		<link>http://borealnemeton.org/on-the-legal-system/after-the-bar</link>
		<comments>http://borealnemeton.org/on-the-legal-system/after-the-bar#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Borealis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[On the Legal System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://borealnemeton.org/?p=52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While we were waiting to have our exams collected and inventoried, and all blatantly disregarding the repeated, but not particularly emphatic instructions not to speak, a member of the Board of Bar Examiners stepped up to the rostrum and announced: WHILE THE PROTCUHS AAH COLLECTING THE EXAMS, THE BOAHD OF BAHR EXAMINUHS WOULD LIKE TO [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we were waiting to have our exams collected and inventoried, and all blatantly disregarding the repeated, but not particularly emphatic instructions not to speak, a member of the Board of Bar Examiners stepped up to the rostrum and announced:<br />
<span id="more-52"></span></p>
<p>WHILE THE PROTCUHS AAH COLLECTING THE EXAMS, THE BOAHD OF BAHR EXAMINUHS WOULD LIKE TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING ANNOUNCEMENT:</p>
<p>THIS AFTUHNOON</p>
<p>WHILE YOU WERE TAKING THE EXAM</p>
<p>THE BOSTON GLOBE REPOWAHTED</p>
<p> </p>
<p>MANNY RODRIGUEZ HAS BEEN TRADED TO THE DAWGUHS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://borealnemeton.org/on-the-legal-system/after-the-bar/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Professor Quotations&#8211;The Final Installment*</title>
		<link>http://borealnemeton.org/on-the-legal-system/professor-quotations-the-final-installment</link>
		<comments>http://borealnemeton.org/on-the-legal-system/professor-quotations-the-final-installment#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 23:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Borealis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[On the Legal System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Things that are not okay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://borealnemeton.org/?p=43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the MA bar review course, guaranteed to amuse those in other states as well as the rising 2Ls and 3Ls. Those who have never studied law may find some of these funny, but I make no warranties. Best wishes to all who must endure what this week brings&#8211;and if anybody reading this took the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the MA bar review course, guaranteed to amuse those in other states as well as the rising 2Ls and 3Ls.</p>
<p>Those who have never studied law may find some of these funny, but I make no warranties.</p>
<p>Best wishes to all who must endure what this week brings&#8211;and if anybody reading this took the Louisiana bar, you are already done, and I do not want to speak to you for the next week (except Ariel.  And Josie.  Okay, I do want to speak to you, just not about the bar exam.)  But you may still enjoy the quotes.  I apologize for the lack of usufruct jokes&#8211;we don&#8217;t have those up North.</p>
<p>And because this post contains some statements of positive law, and because Paul Lisnek tells us to presume non-lawyers are morons for professional responsibility purposes, I feel compelled to tell you that you would have to be a moron to think that anything in this post (or elsewhere on this blog) is legal advice.  If anything here seems to speak to your particular situation (for example, if you have been having sex with a seventeen year old in MA and filming it), do not rely on these quotes.  For the gods&#8217; sake do not comment about it or contact me.  Get a lawyer.</p>
<p><strong>Michael Simons&#8211;Criminal Law and Procedure</strong></p>
<p>Death by lightning is not a natural and probable consequence of a mugging</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t burglarize your own house, but it happens with some regularity on the bar exam</p>
<p>In Massachusetts it is legal to have sex with a seventeen year old, just don&#8217;t take any pictures.  That&#8217;s child pornography.</p>
<p>The last thing you want is for a Mass essay grader to think you&#8217;re from New York!</p>
<p>Drugs.  Yes, they&#8217;re illegal.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been at this for two hours, and so far what have you learned? BAR PREP IS BORING!!</p>
<p>Eye rape is not a crime, thank goodness!<br />
<span id="more-43"></span><br />
<strong>Bob Cohen (you know him)</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;m a covenant, I&#8217;m a covenant, I&#8217;m running with the land!<br />
&#8211;New York Bar examinee</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">I used to ask myself, should I go to my dentist and get a root canal today, or should I study property?</span><span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span></span><span style="font-weight: normal;">The root canal usually won out.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">If you think he&#8217;s in the closet and he&#8217;s not, but in the closet is a baggie labeled &#8220;fleeing felon&#8217;s heroin,&#8221; you can take it&#8221;</span></p>
<p>Paul Lisnek (you had him for the MPRE.  You may have also seen him on CNN)</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">What is the most severe thing the bar can do to you for violating its rules?</span><span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span></span><span style="font-weight: normal;">We fill in number four, &#8220;lethal injection.&#8221;</span></p>
<p>For purposes of the bar exam, laypeople are morons</p>
<p>Once dead, the world is on notice that you&#8217;re probably not practicing anymore.<span> </span>Except where I live in Chicago, where we&#8217;re never quite sure.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ambassadorships are permanent even when the country is temporary</p>
<p>Law professors are like dead lawyers</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">David Epstien </span></p>
<p>Armadillos from Texas Play Rap Eating Tacos</p>
<p>If you have an unlimited number of people, an unlimited number of chainsaws, and an unlimited quantity of beer, you can level any stand of trees within a year</p>
<p>He&#8217;s got my damn grits!!!</p>
<p>There is no masturbation in contract law!!!</p>
<p>Misspelling <em>parol</em><span style="font-style: normal;"> is going to cause whoever is grading that exam to turn off the Sox game and pay more attention to what he is reading.<span> </span>We don&#8217;t want that to happen!!!</span></p>
<p>Maybe <em>parol</em><span style="font-style: normal;"> is how people in early England said &#8220;oral.&#8221;<span> </span>Maybe they went around having </span><em>parol</em><span style="font-style: normal;"> sex!</span></p>
<p>You cannot simply see two numbers on the bar exam and say, &#8216;aha, I am subtracting!&#8217;<span> </span>Read the damn question!</p>
<p>What is the point of this hypo other than another gratuitous, cheap shot at Conviser?<span> </span>Well, that&#8217;s about it…</p>
<p>As luck would have it, they have recenty extended the internet so it reaches all the way into Texas!</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Chemerinski</span></p>
<p>Congress may have thought having a national bake sale would be a good way to raise a lot of dough!</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Paula Franzese</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">This is a time in your life that you deserve to be feeling some happiness.</span><span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span></span><span style="font-weight: normal;">But this right now, this is not about happiness&#8221;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span></p>
<p>The person we have to thank for all of this is named, appropriately, William the Bastard</p>
<p>Gawd bless you.<span> </span>Gawd bless all of you.</p>
<p>&#8220;…and in any event, all of that is irrelevant.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;An ounce of history is worth a pound of logic&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;We wrote the statute!<span> </span>That&#8217;s why they hate us!&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I live for property.<span> </span>I&#8217;ve been teaching property for 22 years.<span> </span>This is my life. And even I&#8217;m bored!&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;This too will pass.  And so will you.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Golf clubs in your hands would be consumer goods.<span> </span>Golf clubs in the hands of Tiger Woods would be equipment.  Golf clubs in the hands of Golf Emporium would be inventory.  Golf clubs in the hands of a deviant farmer would… never be a good thing.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Richard Freer</strong></p>
<p>We&#8217;re going to assume here that Elvis is dead</p>
<p>It just feels good to say to the bar examiners, &#8220;hey, FQ pal!&#8221;</p>
<p>We never remember how many c&#8217;s and how many r&#8217;s in <em>occurrence</em><span style="font-style: normal;"> anyway!</span></p>
<p>In recent years, the Mass examiners have shown no interest in <em>Erie</em><span style="font-style: normal;">, so we have something in common with them.</span></p>
<p>Watch for Hypo #2.<span> </span>It&#8217;s the only sexy thing left in venue!</p>
<p>I bet number two is on the next page.  Should we look?</p>
<p>Supreme Judicial Court. Because people were going to confuse it with the supreme racquetball court!</p>
<p><strong>Mike Sims</strong></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">The California Supreme Court has ruled that it is not malpractice to not understand the Rule Against Perpetuities</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">If you have a pulse and a conscience, you should be able to handle the PR questions.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">If you are not the one person in the world who understands commercial paper, let me give you my guide to faking it.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">You know what lawyers do, right?</span><span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span></span><span style="font-weight: normal;">We fling paper at each other!</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">If you don&#8217;t know any law, learn some.</span><span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span></span><span style="font-weight: normal;">It will help you.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">Wanna have some fun with the bar examiners?</span><span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span></span><span style="font-weight: normal;">After you get done inventing your rule, invent an exception!</span><span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span></span><span style="font-weight: normal;">Then move from your rule to your exception</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;">You did what we all did!</span><span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span></span><span style="font-weight: normal;">You got some Gilberts and some Emmanuel&#8217;s and you got drunk!</span><span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span></span><span style="font-weight: normal;">But you couldn&#8217;t tell anybody, it would ruin the mystique!</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span></p>
<p><strong>Michael Kaufman</strong></p>
<p>As you know by now, I am very very weird!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got a hunch—a very strong hunch—a hunch that this is coming soon to a bar exam near you!</p>
<p><strong>Stanley Johanson</strong></p>
<p>Neither presumption arises if will was last seen in the possession of someone adversely affected by its contents.<span> </span>Then the presumption is hanky panky.</p>
<p>You gotta use human lives!<span> </span>You can&#8217;t use cats, that wouldn&#8217;t be fair!<span> </span>They got nine of &#8216;em!</p>
<p>Making her money the old-fashioned way—she married it!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not nice to kill your father—especially with a dull ax!</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Faust Rossi</span></p>
<p>All they could come up with was the tort of seduction of a previousy-chaste female.<span> </span>That&#8217;s obsolete.<span> </span>The tort, that is.</p>
<p>You leave that kind of wild speculation to law professors who are drafting examination fact patterns while on cocaine.</p>
<p>(<span style="text-decoration: underline;">See</span> <span style="text-decoration: underline;">also</span> the Spring, 2007 edition of Professor Quotations.  Those that were repeated are omitted here)</p>
<p><strong>Roger Schechter</strong></p>
<p>You could learn this subject out of the national enquirer!</p>
<p>Prostitution is illegal.<span> </span>Just because you structure it as a requirements contract doesn&#8217;t change the analysis.</p>
<p>I suggest Susan&#8217;s approach.<span> </span>If you see that same-sex marriage question and you can&#8217;t deal with it, answer it as if it&#8217;s a corporations question!</p>
<p>*Previous installments were published only to Cornell Law students</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://borealnemeton.org/on-the-legal-system/professor-quotations-the-final-installment/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

